?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Puneet · Nayyar

Recent Entries · Archive · Friends · Profile

* * *
Your life in F1 by Beuchi
Name
Your favourite driver is...
Your favourite team is...Sauber
You will sign with...Jordan
Will you win the championship?No
Quiz created with MemeGen!
* * *

This is what I saw at a site.

In the summer of 1992, I was working a Saturday afternoon at the bar when a guy walked in and handed me this resume. He seemed to be on a serious job hunt, because he had a lot of them. I just took it, said we weren't hiring right now, and he left. The first thing I noticed was that it was ten pages long, about nine more than a resume should be. Then I started reading it. All I can say is, when you think you've met the most whacked out fuck-job that God could possibly make, in comes ol' Joseph E. Evans. I can't imagine this was some elaborate joke. The best part is, I don't think he was finished. The last page just seems to drift off. This is the ultimate paranoid conspiracy piece I've ever read. The names have not been changed to protect the innocent, because God protects the innocent as a matter of his heavenly duties (apologies to Vonnegut). Anyway, I scanned the original resume he handed me, because to re-enter it in the computer by typing would lose the whole essence of this piece of... something. You have to read it. Click each link below to read the corresponding page. On some pages, the scanner chopped off the top and bottom line, so I had to type them in. Since posting this, I have had two people tell me that they received the same thing from Joseph E. Evans at around the same time (summer '92). Apparently, he got around. WARNING: It DOES tend to get a bit much. After the first couple of pages, it just turns to babble. However, for posterity's sake, I have included the entire document. I like to be thorough. My question to you is: would you hire him? Other Pages 1    2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10   

* * *

Yesterday Night I watched Citizen Kane. The movie was made in 1941. Multimillionaire newspaper tycoon Charles Foster Kane dies alone in his extravagant mansion, Xanadu, speaking a single word: "Rosebud". In an attempt to figure out the meaning of this word, a reporter tracks down the people who worked and lived with Kane; they tell their stories in a series of flashbacks that reveal much about Kane's life but not enough to unlock the riddle of his dying breath.

The movie reminded me of early Raj Kapoor movies like Aah, Aag and Awara. The storyline was very similar. Although Citizen Kane was not as great as Jaagte Raho, I still saw similarity to Raj Kapoor style of film making. The point worth noting is that Aag and Aah came in late 1940's and early 1950's while Citizen Kane and Meet John Doe started a trend in Hollywood of similar movies at the same time.

We always thought that 'the actor' Raj Kapoor was influenced by Charlie Chaplin. Maybe 'the director' Raj Kapoor shared mutual admiration for western directors like Orson Welles. It is worth noting that Orson Welles acted in most of the movies he directed, just like our own RK.

* * *
1 1=0

By Jerry Tuttle, FCAS


</font>



(The events and persons in this story are fictional. Any resemblance to real people is
purely unintentional.)




   
The miniskirted waitress brought two more beers to the table. She leaned over as she placed each beer bottle on the table, inviting the two male patrons a teasing look down the top of her blouse. She flipped her blonde hair, batted her long eyelashes, and flashed a big smile through her shiny red lipstick. Each of these gestures was designed to elicit a greater than average tip from the two considerably drunk young men. She did not understand that the two men were actuaries who could easily estimate a 15% tip to within a couple of pennies, no matter how drunk or distracted they were.

   
“To my fellow Fellow,” toasted Stanley Wu to his friend Ed Kochowski, surveying
the long row of empty beer bottles, and clearly pleased with himself for what he
thought was a clever toast. Ed clinked beer bottles with his old friend. Ed and Stanley had
just gotten their actuarial exam results, and with this, their final exam, they would be
inducted as Fellows at the next Society meeting.

   
“It has certainly been a long road to Fellowship,” mused Ed. “Partial exams,
new exam structures, transition rules, nation specific exams. So many boring books
and articles to read for each exam. Plus no matter how much they think they ask
thoughtful questions, there were always those damned trivia questions. These should
have been the best years of our lives - in our twenties, single, making good money -
and instead we spent these years studying for the exams.”

   
“I think the Society owes us, big time,” Stanley replied. “The Fellowship bonus
our company pays us does not make up for what the Society put us through. I want to
find some way of really being a pain in the ass to the Society.”

   
“So what do you want to do?” Ed asked. “Hack into the Society’s computer?”

   
“I think that’s been done before,” Stanley said. “Do you remember a couple of
years ago someone did that and switched all the exam results around? It took them
months to resolve all the student complaints. That was pretty funny - until we
realized it affected our exams too.”

   
“Well, I don’t really want to do anything that messes things up for other
students. But it would be sort of fun to play with their heads at the Society,”
Ed said. “Let’s see. What do we do best?”

   
“That’s easy,” Stanley replied. “What we do best is take actuarial exams.”

   
“Hmm. What do you say we take them all over again?” asked Ed with a sly smile.

   
“Why on earth would we want to subject ourselves to that torture?” asked Stanley.

   
“It wouldn’t exactly be US taking the exams. What if we take the exams under
a phony name?” asked Ed.

   
“A phony name? Isn't that called Identity Theft? That must be illegal."

   
"How can it be illegal? Exactly whose identity would we be stealing?"

   
"Good question. Taking the exams again is so ridiculous that it almost
makes sense! What if you and I each use the same phony name, and we alternate -
you take the spring exams and I take the fall exams?”

   
“Great! What name should we use?”

   
“I don’t know. What’s your favorite number?”

   
“e to the pi i. Oh, you mean my favorite non-negative integer? Then you
should have said so. Zero.” Ed wrote down a zero on a napkin. He stared at it.
He rotated it ninety degrees, then another ninety. Of course, it still looked like a zero.

   
Stanley took the napkin. He wrote in letters Z-E-R-O under the zero.
He rotated it ninety degrees. The he rotated it another ninety. “Look,” he
said excitedly. “There’s our phony name!” The letters were upside-down and
reversed, but the spelling was clear: O-R-E-Z.

   
Ed read the letters aloud. “Orez,” he said. “It almost sounds Spanish,
but I don't think it is. How about Joe Orez? After all, Joe really is nothing.”

   
Stanley raised his beer bottle. “Another toast,” he announced. “To the
birth of a new actuary, soon to be a Fellow. To Joe Orez.”

   
Ed and Stanley clinked their bottles and took a drink. They noticed a
couple of attractive women at the bar. “What do you think, Ed - should we
offer to buy them drinks?

   
“Nah,” replied Ed thoughtfully. “After all, we may be Fellows, but we’re
still nerds.”

   
Ed and Stanley left the bar and began making plans to fabricate Joe Orez. They
decided they would each need a picture ID to get into an exam center. Joe would need
an employer, and it had to be one nobody had ever heard of. They quickly listed off
other things they would need.

   
The next day after work, they practiced a Joe Orez signature until they could
both do it identically. They changed into black shirts with black ties, they each
slicked their dark hair back with gel in a decades old style, and they put on black
sunglasses. They went into a stationery store that sold passport photos, paid
fifteen dollars each, and had their photos taken and laminated onto official looking IDs.



Joe Orez's ID card




   
The clerk didn’t blanch as both Ed and Stanley signed their new ID as Joe Orez.
Behind the black sunglasses they looked pretty similar, and they both had deep voices
that even sounded similar. They had decided on a company name for the ID cards -
Stanton Consulting - a partnership, that unlike a corporation did not have to be
registered and would therefore be hard to trace. Over the next few days, Stanton
Consulting got a post office box, a cell phone with a recorded message, a company
credit card, an e-mail address and a web page.



http://www.stantonconsulting.us


   
They agreed on a few ground rules. They would use one of those free online
calendars that the Internet companies were always pushing, to post which of them
were going to be Joe each day. If Joe appeared in public, he would only wear all
black, including the sunglasses, with slicked-back hair. As long as there was no
chance they could inadvertently both be Joe simultaneously, Joe could send e-mails,
answer the phone, attend actuarial meetings, and do everything any other actuary
could do.

   
Joe registered for the first two actuarial exams. He registered online, and he
paid with the company credit card. Ed helped Stanley study by preparing comprehensive
study notes. They figured by working together, they could cut the study time by about
two-thirds. Stanley and Ed were not particularly well-known actuaries, but now they
were afraid someone might recognize them when they showed up for an exam. So although
Joe registered to take the exams in New York City, where both Stanley and Ed worked,
they decided to change the registration at the last possible moment to Buffalo, where
no one knew them, claiming there was an emergency business trip. Stanley as Joe Orez
showed up for the exams in Buffalo, presented his picture ID at the door, and took the
exams without anyone being the wiser. Six weeks later, Joe Orez’s candidate number
appeared on the list for passing both exams.

   
Joe continued signing up for exams two at a time, with Ed and Stanley alternating
every six months on who actually appeared for the exam. Joe passed every exam he took,
and undoubtedly people noticed his name on the pass list multiple times for each sitting.

   
Meanwhile Ed and Stanley decided to start taking Joe public. Joe signed up for the
online Society and Rebel Outpost discussion forums, and he started posting comments.
Joe would critique each exam he took, and he would also comment on rating and reserving
practices, current events, ethics, and whatever else touched his imagination. If
someone wanted to discuss the quantity and size of shrimp at the Society convention
cocktail hour, Joe was ready with a comment. His comments were usually well thought
out, and he seemed to have a greater knowledge of actuarial practices than someone still
taking exams would normally have. But his comments also had a slight nasty tone to them,
and they often generated some spirited discussion.

   
Joe also showed up for some out-of-town actuarial club meetings. In his
unconventional outfit, he always attracted some attention. He would be sure to ask a
question during the discussion period, always stating his name. However, he would not
stay and mingle at the cocktail party afterwards.

   
It didn’t take long at this rate for Joe to pass his last exam and become a
Fellow. In fact, since Joe’s date of birth had been manufactured, he became one of
the youngest fellows ever. Joe registered for the annual Society meeting, proudly
wore his name badge, and got his Fellowship diploma. He duly posed for pictures with
the other new Fellows, but refused to remove his sunglasses. He flinched intentionally
when the photos were taken, so none of the official Society group photos captured him
very clearly. He didn’t mingle much at this meeting, where he thought the chances
were greater that he would run into someone from New York who would know him.

   
As a new Fellow, Joe was recruited for Society committee assignments. He only
joined committees where he could participate by teleconference rather than in person.
He joined an exam committee with the condition that he not be expected to attend
meetings, as his employer did not reimburse those expenses. He dutifully graded his
assigned exams at home and conferred with his grading partners by telephone. He
joined several other committees with the same condition, and he always participated
fully. Every committee chairperson gave Joe high ratings, and they recommended him
for higher-level positions up the committee hierarchy.

   
Occasionally Joe would get a telephone call. Ed and Stanley had bought a cell
phone with minimal monthly minutes, and had put a recorded message on it that
answered with the name of Stanton Consulting. There was a menu with a choice of
employees, none of whom could answer the phone right now, but please leave a message
and they would call you back. When someone left a message for Joe, Ed and Stanley
would figure out which of them should answer it, and one of them did. They did the
same with incoming e-mails. They were careful not to schedule two different
teleconferences for the same day. They used one of those European e-mail anonymizer
services so that even if they both sent e-mails on the same day, the anonymizer would
disguise the fact that the e-mails came from two different computers, making this
fact impossible to trace.

   
Joe started becoming famous, at least in actuarial circles. He wrote study
notes, he participated on twice as many committees as the average actuary, and he
was an outspoken critic in the online discussion forums for everything: the way
the exams are administered, the quality of speakers at Society meetings, the
Society election process, and some common actuarial techniques whose theoretical
bases were a little weak. He politely declined invitations to speak at panel
presentations, but otherwise Joe had become popular and one of the better-known
younger Society members.

   
Well, Joe was popular with the masses, but he was not quite so popular with
the Society staff and with the elected board of directors. To them, Joe seemed
to be constantly criticizing them. Unbeknownst to Ed and Stanley, the Society
staff and board were getting tired of Joe's unending criticisms. Joe was the topic
of a board meeting, when everyone realized the strangest thing - everyone had heard
of Joe, of course. But as well-known as Joe was, nobody on the board could remember
ever meeting him.

   
The Society staff pulled up Joe's file. He had passed all the exams, including
the Professionalism course. He had attended the annual meeting where he was inducted
as a Fellow, and he was included in the group photo of the new Fellows, although he
was pretty unrecognizable behind his dark glasses. He had served on numerous
actuarial committees, paid his dues on time with a valid credit card, and had
written numerous formal and informal documents. However, he never attended any
more actuarial conventions, including the ones where he should have attended to
present his papers.

   
"Why don't we just call him, and invite him to appear at the next board
meeting?" someone asked. "In fact, let's tell him we want to give him a plaque
in recognition of his many contributions to the Society. Then when he shows up,
we'll tell him to stop his countless criticisms of us, or else."

   
President Damien Brady agreed to make the call personally, right in the middle
of the board meeting. As expected, Joe did not pick up the phone, so Damien had to
leave a voice mail message. Not thirty minutes later, Damien got a call on his cell
phone. Joe thanked Damien for the honor, told him it was a great privilege to make
a few minor contributions to the Society, but Stanton Consulting discouraged such
trips. Damien suggested the Society would pay Joe's expenses, and he could speak
to Joe's boss if it would help. Joe replied that his own personal modesty suggested
such a trip was unnecessary, and Joe quickly but firmly declined and hung up.

   
The board was now more mystified than ever. Although Joe seemed to thrive on
the publicity his criticisms generated, he would not even appear at a little board
meeting to pick up a plaque.

   
Damien decided that it was just too strange that nobody had ever met Joe Orez,
and some members of the board half-jokingly questioned whether Joe really existed.
For someone with Joe’s numerous actuarial accomplishments, such a thing seemed
ridiculous. After considerable discussion, it was moved and seconded in a motion
that was not to be recorded that Damien authorize $1,000 to pay for someone to
prove once and for all whether Joe Orez really exists. The board knew it could
not afford a licensed private investigator for $1,000, but they thought another
actuary could solve this problem cheaper and quicker. Damien suggested his old
college buddy and fellow actuary, Rafael Gonzalez.

   
Damien chose Rafael for several reasons. Rafael was a well-respected Fellow,
but quiet and probably not well known among the younger actuaries. He worked in
New York City, as did Joe. Plus, Rafael was somewhat of a mystery buff, having
actually entered the Society's actuarial fiction contest with an original mystery
story a few years back.

   
Rafael was certainly surprised to get such an unusual request, but it piqued
his curiosity and he accepted. The first thing he did was dial Information, but
there was no telephone listing for a Joe or Joseph Orez, either listed or unlisted,
in New York, New Jersey or Connecticut. He pulled up the Stanton Consulting web
site and confirmed that Joe’s business phone on the web site agreed with his listing
in the Society yearbook. He did a search to see who had registered the company web
site, and that name agreed with the name of an IT employee on the site. Rafael
wondered if he could just show up at Joe’s office and surprise him, but Stanton had
a post office box with no street address. He tried a different approach; he fired
off an e-mail to the president, Roger Stanton, asking for a meeting to discuss a
potential consulting assignment. Soon afterwards Roger replied, thanking Rafael
for his interest in Stanton Consulting, but regretfully declining because Stanton
only has a limited staff and was not accepting new projects right now.

   
Rafael gathered a collection of Joe Orez’s bulletin board postings. He studied
them, but he could not come up with any reason why they might be particularly
unusual. He decided for fun to forward them to Judy Maguire, an English professor
friend of his. At first Judy did not find them unusual either, although she commented
that Joe obviously has a highly narcissistic personality. However, a week later, she
e-mailed Rafael to tell him she had made a surprising discovery. Judy had run the
e-mails through a computer program designed to test authorship. Similar to the
tools used to test whether Francis Bacon or someone else wrote some of Shakespeare’s
plays, Judy concluded that due to the frequency of Joe’s word patterns, the
probability was high that more than one person wrote the Joe e-mails.


Judy had a couple more scholarly tidbits: “I don’t know if this is significant,
but did you know the name Orez is the Hebrew word for rice? But I checked with some
linguistics experts, and Orez is not a Hebrew surname and doesn’t seem to be a
surname of any known nationality.”

   
Not sure what to make of the rice and the Hebrew reference, but armed with this
knowledge that Joe’s identity was now more suspicious than ever, Rafael decided to
take a bold step. He e-mailed an actuarial survey to every Fellow. The idea was
brilliant, if somewhat unethical, and depended on a well-known security flaw in
most people’s word processing software: Rafael’s survey contained a hidden file
attachment. If the recipient completed the survey and e-mailed it back to Rafael,
Rafael would then have a small piece of spy software installed on the recipient’s
computer. Rafael was sure that the egotistical Joe could not resist the opportunity
to comment on Society matters, and indeed Joe was among the first Fellows who
returned the survey.

   
Several days later, Stanley and Ed met for beers in the same bar where the Joe
Orez idea had originated. Each of them had some Joe Orez news to share with the other.

   
Stanley explained that he discovered someone was hacking into his home computer.
Stanley considered himself quite the computer techie, and he had some elaborate
anti-spy software. He was able to probe backwards into the computer of the person
doing the spying until he discovered that person’s name. He didn’t recognize the
name, until he ran it against various databases of names. “You’ll never believe
who it is – another actuary!” he exclaimed. “I never heard of him, but he is some
older guy named Rafael Gonzalez.”

   
“I checked my computer, and I made sure to encrypt anything personal. As far
as Rafael knows, he has hacked into Joe Orez’s computer. In fact, I added a bunch
of actuarial spreadsheets and memos with different dates under Joe’s name. Then I
probed Rafael’s computer, and I discovered he is on a mission from the Society to
track down Joe’s identity.”

   
“Wow! What do you think we should do about this?” asked Ed.

   
“I think we should divert Rafael’s attention a little bit. I did some research
on him, and I was able to recreate enough of his employment and personal history to
be dangerous. I pretended to send Rafael’s resume to Stanton Consulting. Then I
sent Rafael an e-mail under the name of Roger Stanton, president of Stanton
Consulting, thanking Rafael for his resume and interest in the company, but
unfortunately there are no job openings at the moment. Soon Rafael’s resume
will go out to two hundred random actuarial employers. I wonder if one of those
two hundred is his current employer?”

   
“That should slow him down a little!” replied Ed. “Now I have some news for
you. I picked up a phone message for Joe today from one of the younger Fellows.
The Society presidential election is coming up, and the Nominating Committee has
put up a pretty stodgy candidate. The younger Fellows want Joe Orez to run for
Society president. Isn’t that hilarious?”

   
“What a goof that would be! I say we run Joe for president. After all, he
is so opinionated that he would make a wonderful candidate,” Stanley replied.

   
Ed agreed, and the two of them sent in the form to run Joe for Society
president. Joe was deliberately vague on his background – purposely omitting
his college degree, for example, since that would be something traceable. They
couldn’t have the scandal of Joe claiming to have a degree from, say Harvard,
when Harvard would have no record of him. Although his education was lacking,
in his short actuarial career Joe did have an impressive resume of Society committee
assignments and publications.

   
In the following months, Joe participated in the spirited online debate
over Society presidential issues, never failing to reply to any issue, no matter
how trivial. Joe always took the youthful, liberal, anti-establishment position,
much to the dismay of the older and more conservative actuaries. The Society
had grown so much in recent years, that there was talk that Joe had a majority
of the membership behind him. However, it was well known that the younger
actuaries felt disenfranchised by the Society and were unlikely to vote in
the election.

   
Breaking with tradition, the Nominating Committee’s candidate called Joe
and invited him to a face-to-face debate, to be shown live over the Internet.
Joe politely declined, not wanting any more exposure than he already had.

   
Stanley and Ed were having a great time with all this, howling in laughter
in how easily the Society had been duped over the whole Joe Orez charade.
Another thing they found pretty funny was a letter Rafael had sent to Roger
Stanton, apologizing for the fact that somehow his resume had been sent to
Roger in error. Stanley wondered how many similar letters Rafael had written
to other companies. Rafael seemed no closer to discovering Joe’s secret.

   
“Rafael doesn’t know what Joe looks like. Do you know what Rafael looks
like?” Ed asked.

   
“No, why?”

   
“I went to the post office box an hour ago to pick up Joe’s mail, and
there was a middle aged guy hanging around near Joe’s box as if he was waiting
to see who opened it,” Ed explained. “I decided not to go to the box with him
there.”

   
“I thought Rafael gave up on outing Joe. But if Rafael is still at the
post office, maybe Joe himself should pick up the mail today. How about if I
get dressed up as Joe and get the mail?”

   
“I love it! That will really freak Rafael out,” replied Ed.

   
Stanley went to the post office dressed as Joe, waited until there was a
large group of people he could sneak behind, and picked up the mail. Rafael had
been waiting a long time for someone to take mail out of Joe’s box, and he was
not ready for someone to do so. By the time Rafael recovered from his shock,
Joe was long gone. Stanley could see Rafael cursing from a distance away, that
he had missed his chance to catch Joe live.

   
A few more months passed, and finally it was time for the election. Joe
dutifully voted for himself as president, as did Stanley and Ed, so they know
Joe would get at least three votes. When the votes were counted, Joe had been
elected Society president.

   
“This is great,” exclaimed Stanley. “Can you imagine all the reforms we can
push through as president? Where should we start?”

   
“Are you crazy?” Ed asked. “Joe doesn’t exist. He can’t be president. Plus,
he is going to have to appear in public at the convention, to attend board meetings
and club meetings, and to give all sorts of speeches and presentations. How do we
get permission from our boss to do this? We can’t keep saying that Joe can’t
travel. I hate to say this, but I think it’s time to give up the charade.”

   
“You’re not saying that you want to confess Joe is a fraud, are you?” asked Stanley.

   
“I think we’ve taken this too far. Yes, I think it’s time to confess,” replied Ed.

   
“Do you mean confess publicly, like Dustin Hoffman did in the movie ‘Tootsie’?
I don’t think so,” Stanley said defiantly. “I’d rather die first than admit defeat.”

   
“Die? Wow – what a great idea! Let’s kill Joe! It would be so easy! All we
need to do is write an obituary and have it printed in the newspaper. Do you think
the newspaper actually verifies each death notice it prints?”

   
Ed made a quick call to The New York Times, and he learned the minimum price of
an obituary was $172. “Boy – the cost of dying is more expensive than I thought!
At least we can stop paying Society dues for him.”

   
Stanley looked at Ed with a tear in his eye. “This is so sad. Are you sure we
should do this? I feel like I’m losing a good friend.”

   
“I think it’s the merciful thing to do. Let Joe go out with the dignity he deserves.”

   
“Oh, let’s do one more thing before Joe dies. Let’s send our friend Rafael a
little package,” Stanley said, and he and Ed prepared a box. They included a note,
and they dated it October 31.

   
The obituary appeared in the Times on November 3. Just to be sure the Society
saw it, Roger Stanton faxed a copy to the Society office.


Joseph P. Orez, 25, of New York City, died unexpectedly in his sleep on November 1.
Mr. Orez was an actuarial consultant and partner at Stanton Consulting. He was a
Fellow in the actuarial society and despite his young age had recently been elected
its president. A private ceremony was held on November 2 for family and close
friends. Memorial donations may be made to the Actuarial Education and Research
Fund in Schaumburg, Illinois.


   
Phone calls and e-mails to Stanton Consulting received an auto-reply that the
company was devastated by the death of Joe Orez, and that the company was temporary
closed. Several weeks later Roger Stanton sent out an e-mail that the company could
not survive without its only actuary, and the company, which was a partnership, was
dissolving. Soon after, the telephone, web page, e-mail and post office box were all closed.

   
Damien Brady, the Society staff and the Society board considered the Joe Orez
matter closed. They thanked Rafael for his work and discharged him from his duties.
Rafael found the obituary extremely puzzling. He had many unanswered questions.
Why was there was no specific mention of surviving family members? What was the
name of the funeral parlor? Where were Joe’s remains? Rafael checked with the
Times. The obituary had been faxed to the newspaper with the letterhead of a funeral parlor, and the newspaper had a valid credit card charge for $172 for the obituary from Stanton Consulting. Rafael then tried to check on the funeral parlor, but nobody had heard of it. He called Information, and there was no personal phone listing for any member of Stanton Consulting. He was not happy with this turn of events.

   
The next day, Rafael received a box at work with the following note, dated
October 31:




Dear Mr. Gonzalez,



Although you and I have never met, I know you took an avid interest in my life and
activities. I am not feeling well, and I will not be needing these any longer.
Perhaps you would like them as a small remembrance of me.



Sincerely,

Joe Orez





   
The box contained the two pairs of Joe’s black sunglasses. As Rafael munched
on his lunch of Chinese take-out food at his desk, he looked at the sunglasses,
thought about Joe, and then looked at his food. Chicken with broccoli and rice.
Rice? Didn’t Judy the English professor say that Orez is Hebrew for rice? And
Hebrew is read from right to left. If you read Orez from right to left, you get
Zero. Could that mean something? Nah.




END


* * *
* * *
* * *
American talk show host, and keen F1 fan, David Letterman couldn't allow last
Sunday's moment of ministerial madness at Silverstone to pass by without
comment. Letterman, who has had several F1 drivers on his highly popular show
over the years, including Michael Schumacher, Juan Pablo Montoya and David
Coulthard, came up with a top ten of 'captions' for the image of the kilted
de-frocked priest running down Hanger Straight.

Here's his 'Top Ten'

10: "Isn't this the running of the bulls?"
9: "Okay, maybe I should've just sprung for cable"
8: "Where are all the bloody taxis?"
7: "What great special effects in this movie, you feel like you're right there"
6: "Was it '2 pills every 12 hours' or '12 pills every 2 hours'?"
5: "The race cars are more scared of me than I am of them"
4: "The prix is even grander up close"
3: "I'm an idiot"
2: "So now I know, 13 beers is my limit"
1: "I wonder who'll be speaking at my funeral"
Current Mood:
mischievous mischievous
* * *
Today I read in Delhi Times about a 3 yr. old kid with some amount of cricket knowledge. The kid knows the difference between
'square leg' and 'gully', which a certain well read Sardar (to protect his identity, lets just call him Arunjeet Singh, resident of
71/76 prem nagar, Janak Puri, Delhi) can't claim to know. The kid also remembers the name of players of a particular country.

Now lets compare him to my nephew, Nakul. Till a few months ago, he just knew one sentence about cricket. That was
"Mongia paagal hai". He must have heard this from his dad while watching a cricket match. From that day onwards, whenever
he saw a cricket match on TV, all he had to say was "Mongia paagal hai......". This continued even in the period after Nayan
Mongia left the team and Dinesh Mongia joined in.

As he grew a little, his reactions changed. Whenever you switched on a cricket match he would say "Mongia paagal hai" and
would then turn to you and ask "hai naa????" for confirmation. As if I was gonna say no to that :-)

Don't know much about Mongia being 'paagal' but can definately say that TOI and that kid are definately 'paagal'. ' hai naa
Nakul??'....
Current Mood:
happy happy
* * *
I'm not at all for crime, but sometimes, you just have to admire the criminals. I love a well thought out crime mystery, like the kind where the tracks are covered well, and the cops have a hard time finding the perpetrators.

Everyone has committed some kind of crime in their life, or at least thought about it. I wouldn't use a gun though. There are varying degrees of crime, of course. Someone stealing a piece of gum from a candy story probably wouldn't see jail time, yet someone robbing a bank probably would. However, if you use a gun to steal that piece of gum, you're probably going to be in a small cell for a while, with a roommate named "Raju".

That said, let me describe the crime for you. From what the police in Melbourne, Australia can determine, a pair of robbers stole a van, then, armed with a shotgun, stole two bags from a service station employee walking through the shopping mall parking lot. At gunpoint. They drove the van up, screeched to a halt, and pointed the gun at this unsuspecting clerk, who was only doing his job. The clerk, being wise and wanting to live to see another day, handed the bags over with little resistance, and the thieves drove off. They sped away to their freedom, with two sacks full of bounty.

Police, of course, are searching for the armed robbers, but clues are thin. They haven't recovered the van or loot as of yet, but they're searching for these armed and dangerous criminals. I think anyone that would use a gun to commit a crime should be shot, and these two, if caught, will be charged with armed robbery.

Oh, the sacks? It seems they were full of trash and headed for the garbage can.....
Current Mood:
amused amused
Current Music:
Yeh Raat (AKS)
* * *
My colleague ask's me after reading the previous entry, if I belive in life outside this planet. Hmmm........ I'll pick a quote from the movie.

Jodie Foster : Dad, do you think there's people on other planets?
Dad: I don't know. But I guess I'd say if it is just us... seems like an awful waste of space.

Other quotes frm the movie:

Mathematics is the only true universal language.

"Dr. Arroway will be spending her precious telescope time listening for... uh... listening for... "
Jodie Foster : Little green men.

Jay Leno: So there's life on other planets. That's sure going to change the Miss Universe contest!

Current Mood:
cynical cynical
* * *
Finally saw the end of contact (movie) on star movies. This time mine or my cablewalla's electricity did'nt fail!!!
Nice movie except for the ending with Jodie Foster crying in the middle of the inquiry. It didn't look like an inquiry. It had all the ppl seated around in an auditorium of sorts. Seemed like the inquiry was held in the senate......
Jodie Foster always reminds me of Helen Hunt and vise versa. One fleeting glance and I'll always fumble with the identity. Anyways she has 3 men in movie around her : Matthew McConaughey, William Fichtner and Tom Skerritt.
McConaughey plays a father(rev. walla) in the movie. UNCONVINCING. Acted well but doesn't seem like a father, maybe its just an aftereffect of wedding planner.
Speaking of wedding planner the new movie coming out 'Kuch na kaho' with AB Jr. ans Ash is a copy of 'wedding planner'. Ouch......
Current Mood:
contemplative contemplative
Current Music:
Kuch na kaho
* * *
* * *

Previous · Next